Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Headcount, average pay, length of service, sub-agencies, and hiring trends for Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, drawn directly from the OPM Federal Workforce Data (June 2026).
OPM FedScope stock folio
Employment stock June 2026 Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is a smaller federal agency: 40 employees (0.0% of the federal civilian workforce) across 4 states (including DC). At an average salary of $133,711 it pays above the federal average of $117,339, and headcount declined 2.4% from the prior period.
Monthly FedScope employment stock for Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission - headcount, pay, tenure, and nearest peer names from the same OPM extract (40 employees · $133,711 avg).
- HEAD 40
- RANK #81/126
- PAY $133,711
- LOS 15.8 yrs
- SHARE 0.0%
- STATES 4
- NET -1
- SUBS 1
- PHOTO Chemical Safety/hazard Inves
- BOOK OPM FWD
Headcount peers
Photo peer: Chemical Safety/hazard Investigation Bd (42 employees)
According to OPM FedScope June 2026, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission ranks #81 of 126 federal agencies by headcount (the same employee_count ordering as our agencies directory and /rankings/largest-agencies). Peer bars use similar workforce size, not duty-station geography. Corpus placement →
Salary Analysis · Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
How Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission pay compares to the federal average of $117,339.
Agency Average
$133,711
Federal Average
$117,339
vs. Federal Avg
+14.0%
Where Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission ranks on pay
Ranked by agency (not weighted by headcount), its average salary of $133,711 is higher than 31% of the 121 federal agencies (38 pay less on average). Smaller specialized agencies often post higher per-employee averages than large ones like Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, so this agency-count rank can differ from a comparison to the government-wide, employee-weighted average shown above. The highlighted bar marks where Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission sits in the federal pay distribution.
Average-salary distribution across all 121 federal agencies; Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission ranks higher than 31%.
Salary Range by Sub-agency
Under $80K
0
$80K–$100K
0
$100K–$120K
0
$120K–$150K
40
Over $150K
0
Sub-agencies & Organizational Units
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission has 1 sub-agencies. The highest-paying unit averages $133,711.
| Sub-agency | Employees | Avg Salary | Avg LOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission | 40 | $133,711 | 15.8 yrs |
Geographic Presence
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission has employees in 4 states (including DC). District of Columbia has the most with 32 employees.
| State | Employees | Avg Salary | Avg LOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | 32 | $136,394 | 14.6 yrs |
| Colorado | 4 | $130,444 | 26.1 yrs |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | $86,832 | 9.9 yrs |
| Virginia | 1 | $209,600 | 31.6 yrs |
Workforce Dynamics
Dynamics feed (RSS)Monthly hiring and separation trends. Net change over 1 months: -1.
| Month | Accessions | Separations | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +0 | -1 | -1 |
vs Federal Hiring Climate
OPM FedScope dynamics for Jun 2026 — Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission against the same-month federal civilian totals (not a forecast).
Agency net (Jun 2026)
-1
+0 / −1
Federal net (Jun 2026)
+2,416
+15,984 / −13,568
Share of federal accessions
0.00%
Moved against the federal climate this month
Hiring & Separation Reasons
Why employees join and leave Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Separation Reasons
QUIT
1
Similar-Sized Agencies
Federal agencies with a similar workforce size to Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Showing 6 of 125 other federal agencies.
Chemical Safety/hazard Investigation Bd
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Adv Council on Historic Preservation
Cmte for Purch Frm Pple Blind or Sev Dis
National Capital Planning Commission
Architectl & Trans Barrier Compliance Bd
Nationwide agencies with similar pay or tenure
Two peer sets for Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission on OPM FedScope averages that vary across the full agency corpus, not duty-station geography or sub-agency hierarchy.
Similar average salary
Nearest agency-wide average salaries ($133,711 here).
Similar average tenure
Nearest agency-wide average length of service (15.8 years here).
How these figures are calculated
The pay percentile above is computed live from PlainGovJobs' own OPM FedScope database, not hand-typed: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission's average salary is ranked against every other federal agency's average salary, agency-by-agency (not weighted by headcount), and the percentile is the share of agencies whose average is strictly lower.
The sub-agency pay-span bars sum each sub-agency's own employee_count into one of five salary bands based on that sub-agency's average salary; the bands add up exactly to Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission's total employee count, since every sub-agency is counted in exactly one band.
See the methodology page for the full source-to-page pipeline and refresh cadence.
Data Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) FedScope Employment Cubes, June 2026. Federal civilian non-seasonal full-time and part-time employees. Data does not include military personnel, postal workers, or intelligence agency staff. Last updated: 2026-08-11.
Data currency: Employment stock from OPM Federal Workforce Data June 2026 (prior-period deltas vs May 2026); monthly hiring/separations from FWD Dynamics June 2024–June 2026 (filled civilian headcount and flows, not live USAJOBS vacancy listings). State pages sum only duty stations with a disclosed US state/DC code; 898,675 employees have redacted geography in the release and appear in the national total only. Database compiled 2026-08-11. See our methodology § populations for the three windows. Spot a figure that looks wrong? Report a correction.