PlainGovJobs
OPM FWD June 2026 Federal civilian workforce

International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada

Headcount, average pay, length of service, sub-agencies, and hiring trends for International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada, drawn directly from the OPM Federal Workforce Data (June 2026).

OPM FedScope stock folio

Employment stock June 2026 International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada

International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada is a smaller federal agency: 14 employees (0.0% of the federal civilian workforce) across 4 states (including DC). At an average salary of $168,321 it pays well above the federal average of $117,339.

Monthly FedScope employment stock for International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada - headcount, pay, tenure, and nearest peer names from the same OPM extract (14 employees · $168,321 avg).

  • HEAD 14
  • RANK #105/126
  • PAY $168,321
  • LOS 16.3 yrs
  • SHARE 0.0%
  • STATES 4
  • NET -1
  • SUBS 1
  • PHOTO Denali Commission
  • BOOK OPM FWD

Photo peer: Denali Commission (11 employees)

National Commission on Libra…17 employeesInternational Joint Commissi…14 employeesDenali Commission11 employeesUtah Reclamation Mitigation …11 employeesNuclear Waste Technical Revi…11 employeesFederal Financial Inst. Exam…11 employees
Nearest similar-headcount agencies vs International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada. Source: OPM FedScope June 2026.

According to OPM FedScope June 2026, International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada ranks #105 of 126 federal agencies by headcount (the same employee_count ordering as our agencies directory and /rankings/largest-agencies). Peer bars use similar workforce size, not duty-station geography. Corpus placement →

International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada pay book (rich avg)

Rich-pay strip (14 employees · $168,321 avg) vs federal average $117,339.

Agency Average

$168,321

Federal Average

$117,339

vs. Federal Avg

+43.4%

Where International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada ranks on pay

Ranked by agency (not weighted by headcount), its average salary of $168,321 is higher than 81% of the 121 federal agencies (98 pay less on average). Smaller specialized agencies often post higher per-employee averages than large ones like International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada, so this agency-count rank can differ from a comparison to the government-wide, employee-weighted average shown above. The highlighted bar marks where International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada sits in the federal pay distribution.

$10,9561$61,63014$112,30476$162,97825$213,6522$264,3263
Distribution of average salary across all 121 federal agencies (OPM FedScope) - International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada is in the highlighted range.

Average-salary distribution across all 121 federal agencies; International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada ranks higher than 81%.

Source: OPM Federal Workforce Data As of June 2026

Sub-agency pay span (thin agency)

Under $80K

0

$80K–$100K

0

$100K–$120K

0

$120K–$150K

0

Over $150K

14

Sub-agencies & Organizational Units

International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada has 1 sub-agencies. The highest-paying unit averages $168,321.

Sub-agency Employees Avg Salary
International Joint Commission: United States and Canada 14 $168,321

Geographic Presence

International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada has employees in 4 states (including DC). District of Columbia has the most with 9 employees.

State Employees Avg Salary
District of Columbia 9 $165,906
Michigan 3 $164,513
New York 1 $184,900
North Dakota 1 $184,900

Workforce Dynamics

Dynamics feed (RSS)

Monthly hiring and separation trends. Net change over 1 months: -1.

Month Accessions Separations Net
Jan 2025 +0 -1 -1

vs Federal Hiring Climate

OPM FedScope dynamics for Jan 2025 — International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada against the same-month federal civilian totals (not a forecast).

Agency net (Jan 2025)

-1

+0 / −1

Federal net (Jan 2025)

+25

+29 / −4

Share of federal accessions

0.00%

Moved against the federal climate this month

Hiring & Separation Reasons

Why employees join and leave International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada

Separation Reasons

TRANSFER OUT - INDIVIDUAL TRANSFER

1

Nationwide agencies with similar pay or tenure

Two peer sets for International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada on OPM FedScope averages that vary across the full agency corpus, not duty-station geography or sub-agency hierarchy.

How these figures are calculated

The pay percentile above is computed live from PlainGovJobs' own OPM FedScope database, not hand-typed: International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada's average salary is ranked against every other federal agency's average salary, agency-by-agency (not weighted by headcount), and the percentile is the share of agencies whose average is strictly lower.

The sub-agency pay-span bars sum each sub-agency's own employee_count into one of five salary bands based on that sub-agency's average salary; the bands add up exactly to International Joint Commission: U.S. and Canada's total employee count, since every sub-agency is counted in exactly one band.

See the methodology page for the full source-to-page pipeline and refresh cadence.

Data Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) FedScope Employment Cubes, June 2026. Federal civilian non-seasonal full-time and part-time employees. Data does not include military personnel, postal workers, or intelligence agency staff. Last updated: 2026-08-11.

Data sourced from OPM FedScope Employment Cubes and Federal Workforce Data (FWD). See our methodology for details, or report a data error on this page. Retrieved and formatted by PlainGovJobs

Data currency: Employment stock from OPM Federal Workforce Data June 2026 (prior-period deltas vs May 2026); monthly hiring/separations from FWD Dynamics June 2024–June 2026 (filled civilian headcount and flows, not live USAJOBS vacancy listings). State pages sum only duty stations with a disclosed US state/DC code; 898,675 employees have redacted geography in the release and appear in the national total only. Database compiled 2026-08-11. See our methodology § populations for the three windows. Spot a figure that looks wrong? Report a correction.